Friday, October 14, 2005

Week 2 Analysis

First off I want to apologize for not having my stuff in Thursday morning. I was lying in bed with the chills, and running a rather ridiculously high fever. Probably every conflict is fought on at least two grounds: the battlefield and the minds of the people via propaganda. The latter, the war on peoples minds, is often used prior to the actual war. In many cases, war itself is not to be expected. Consequently, propaganda is often employed to get closer to war, if that is the preferred foreign policy option. Here are 4 rather simplistic views of how propaganda is passed down to its subjects (I’m sure you will be aware of them and their examples) 1. The Big Lie, adapted by Hitler and Stalin. (i.e. state-controlled Egyptian press has been spreading a Big Lie, saying the World Trade Center was attacked by Israel to embarrass Arabs) 2. The truth doesn’t matter, but give them a story that is plausible. (i.e. demonizing the “enemy” who does not fit into the picture of what is right, reinforcing reasons and motivations to act due to threats on the security of the individual) 3. Tell the truth, yet do not give the other side’s viewpoint. (using partial facts, or historical context, using a narrow range of discourse, using selective stories that come over as wide-covering and objective) 4. Tell the truth (both sides), the good and the bad. Western governments, for the most part, avoid The Big Lie, because their peoples will not allow such bold lies. However, the governments are able to manufacture consent through the creative use of the last 3 steps. I find this to be most frustrating because the ones spewing out this propaganda are more often than not, the ones who stand on the sidelines and facilitate, rather than engage in battle. Next let’s take a look at what strategy of propaganda various terrorists groups employ as cited in Identifying Religious Terrorism through Profiles of Propaganda by Roderick Hindey. He says there are 3 basic approaches repetitive formulas and self-hypnotic meditations; the targeting of youth binary thinking in simplistic terms “Although indoctrination and propaganda do not always result in terrorism, they logically precede it. And although propaganda and indoctrination do not work like weapons of physical mass destruction directly, in terms of damage to human minds and freedom they function as weapons of incredible mass destruction”(Hindey). In order to move along in the peace process, especially in regards to terrorism, there needs to be a proactive defense. First off, we must understand propaganda and accurately interpret its message. We have to be able to think critically about the herd-type of thinking and demand that others do as well (this means pointing the finger at ourselves first). We (ourselves and others) must learn to be unafraid of otherness and to interact with viewpoints opposed to our own. One of the leading structures which give rise to our problem of War, Terrorism, and Militarism are therefore the media outlets which allow for such subliminal propaganda. We are fed the news and given facts which are most likely skewed. The responsibility of people who claim Christ as their Savior is to interpret and search out the truth. We cannot be naïve to think that these things do not matter. We cannot base our knowledge of world issues on popular media. We must take a Biblically sound, intelligent view of the world. We must not align ourselves solely to patriotism and nationalism, but rather to that of Godliness and Christ-likeness, first and foremost.

1 Comments:

Blogger Joshua Martinez said...

(David) I think that your progression of thought on the demise of shalom is solid. The good does become perverse because we become fattened up with the rich spoil of our plunder in war. We say “look, I am well fed! See, the perversion wasn’t so bad.” Or “If it wasn’t for this perversion you wouldn’t even be here, or have the freedom to enjoy your spoil” The benefits of going to war almost always seem to be ad-hominem, or after the fact. The so-called justifications of War are at most, credulous, and must be therefore strengthened, not in rational arguments but in subliminal propaganda. (See my post on propaganda and its relation to War and terrorism) Eventually, after the war has been fought the justifications become amusingly clearer. The evolution of the structure of the beaten up society well, evolves, and then we pick a good story and say, “look, if we hadn’t have gone to war, Women would not have been liberated in Afghanistan”. Like America would ever fight a war to liberate women. (maybe with Hilary in Office) They are not justifications for war; they are war consequences (I do not mean consequence in a bad way). They arise out of the ashes of war, and when the dust settles warring countries are able to examine them. If the ashes make a rather beautiful shape, they say look, were we not justified.
(Reed) The casualties are something we must always keep in constant reflection. The powers and institutions that lead nations and states into war often times bypass these meager facts. Not only are we devastating the lives of innocent families, we are ruining future lives of soldiers (through various psychological problems) and their families and, almost matter of factly, ruining our future environment. As Christians, and people who see life as something significant, we need to take into account these people and their stories. There must be a voice keeping the powers accountable to the costs of war, not just the accrued cost, but the future cost as well. I think that this can be a strong point against going into war, especially a war with little parameters and no foreseeable hope for an end. A war declared against an idea (terrorism) is a war which may never have an end.
Responding to a different topic… it seems that militarism arises only in the countries whose peoples are identified synonymously with the state. Militarism arises when one nation becomes powerful and its subjects become reliant upon that power or personal gain, resulting in happiness. The only way to retain that power is to ensure around the world that you are the dominant power. When Institutions question your dominance, you therefore smugly reply, because with power comes great responsibility, and our responsibility is to make sure you all are doing alright. The will of the people becomes aligned with the state and its policies.
Our allegiance first and foremost must be to God, not the nation-state.
(There is a lot of good information about Just-Peacemaking in the http://www.peacecoalition.org/facts/PDF/just_peacemaking.pdf article. However, I need more time to sit with this so I will probably be writing about it in the next week analysis. Also there is a case study in Somalia, concerning an aspect of just-peacemaking called just enforcement, and why it doesn’t work.)
Finally I want to give my links that I feel adequately respond to the question “what are the practices/structures that give rise to the problem?”
http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/Media/Military.asp -I feel that this link is able to show how institutions are able to sugar-coat reasons for war. I think that the media is an institution that gives rise to our problem. For one because it already is aligned to various corporate counterparts, who have alignments back with the institutions. (This is what most lobbyist groups do in D.C., they push a corporate agenda, whose ultimate end is MONEY, mwoohaa, haa, haa)
http://www.wichurches.org/board/statements/studyguide.doc - I came across this online. It is a sort of bible study/small group activity which has the people responding to the questions that we are asking. The statement declares the Wisconsin Council of Church’s’s intent to spread the knowledge of nonviolence in the Church and society and to work toward a nonviolent world. It begins by examining the problems of violence in our society. It emphasizes the hidden, structural violence that is rooted in systemic imbalance of power that affords greater access to power and resources for some groups at the neglect and/or expense of others.I think it is pretty neato!

9:37 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home